Juan Cole points out that two weeks of Bush’s post-war war in
Thursday, December 30, 2004
tsunami math
Tuesday, December 28, 2004
Sunday, December 26, 2004
whiny campus republicans
So, the foolishness about liberals on campus continues. In response to the recent articles about how there are more democrats than republicans on faculties, a colleague started a series of emails about the whole thing. I won’ t post those here, though I will note some of the rebuttal links, from Ellen Goodman and the LATimes. (See also my earlier post on Juan Cole.)
And I’ll respond to a piece forwarded from the Chronicle of Higher Ed.
The pseudonymous Chronicle author reports on his oppressively liberal education:
During an "Introduction to Political Science" class, for example, I was required to write paper [sic] on how to solve global warming. My paper suggested that perhaps there was no reason to, since the scientific evidence was inconclusive. I got a D.
Now, it’s true that the overwhelming scientific consensus on this might not have been as evident when this fellow was an undergraduate-- I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt on that. But after all there’s something to be said for actually responding to an assignment. And even that leftist cabal, the Pentagon, considers the thought experiment worth engaging.
He also complains
In another class, I fell victim to my own indignation at having to use inclusive language in my papers. Flexing the muscle of my perceived linguistic superiority -- the masculine third-person singular pronoun across many languages functions as the generic, genderless third person, after all -- I argued that "he" should be in and "s/he" should be out. Another D paper.
Well, historically, “he” was not a gender-neutral pronoun in English. It was in the 18th century that academies tried to regularize the language, and decided it should count for that. But in fact, of course, people do tend to imagine the person referred to as “he” is male. And, again, there’s the responding-to-the-assignment issue.
Finally he bemoans the parking lot at his new job:
the rustless Volvos and Subarus exuded a clear semiotics of inclusion and exclusion. … “here we drive academic cars”
Ok, this one is just whiny. A Subaru only costs about two thousand dollars more than the Honda Accord the writer reports driving himself, and since he was recently out of grad school, well of course he drove a cheaper car than the faculty members who’d probably paid off those grad school debts and gotten used to having a decent paycheck. I mean, assuming the cars’ prices are the issue here. They're "rustless," by the way, because his new job is in the South. And if it’s just an aesthetic thing, well, I drive a Honda myself (okay, it’s a hybrid Insight, but still). Whiny.
Saturday, December 25, 2004
fascists r us
Gonzales, loss of habeas corpus, torture, right wing judges-to-be, the lapdog lying press--Elaine Cassel in Counterpunch lists some of the disasters of our fascist state.
happy holidays
Thursday, December 16, 2004
military family values
The article observes that the plan to send more troops to
Friday, December 10, 2004
our tax dollars at work
Rep Henry Waxman's report on The Content of Federally Funded Abstinence- Only Education Programs finds that these curricula, meant for children and adolescents, present "false, misleading, or distorted information about reproductive health" (including assertions that an abortion will make you sterile and that condoms don't protect against STDs) and stunningly outdated stereotypes about gender roles. For example, one curriculum lists 'Financial Support' as one of 'The 5 Major Needs of Women' and 'Domestic Support' as one of 'The 5 Major Needs of Men.' The curriculum states: "Just as a woman needs to feel a man's devotion to her, a man has a primary need to feel a woman's admiration. To admire a man is to regard him with wonder, delight and approval. A man feels admired when his unique characteristics and talents happily amaze her."
(via Girl In The Locker Room)
I don't need anyone supporting me financially, but anyone who's seen my apartment can tell you I could really use some domestic support. Apparently, I'm a man.
That's why I pay my taxes to kill Iraqi civilians.
Thursday, December 09, 2004
vote, schmote, smote
Well my comrades tell me the vote counting issue was dismissed at the Solidarity meeting not as insufficiently socialist or revolutionary or progressive, but as already taken care of, as not neglected, not the next place to push an analysis or action.
Fair enough.
But isn’t it inconsistent of me to suggest I’m some poststructuralist postmodernist ex-post-positivist, and then the next week or so be saying something is just wrong?
Well, duh.
And in other military coverups: Whitewashing torture? A veteran sergeant who told his commanding officers that he witnessed his colleagues torturing Iraqi detainees was strapped to a gurney and flown out of
Monday, December 06, 2004
vote, vote, who's got the vote?
At Sunday's Solidarity meeting (the socialist brunch group), the view seemed to be that the socialist reason to care about this sort of thing is to connect with minority voters. Call me naive, but I can't help feeling it's just wrong to be disenfranchising people and rigging elections.
And then there's the affidavit from the fellow in Florida who says he was hired by Rep. Tom Feeny (R-FL) to write vote rigging software.
Wednesday, December 01, 2004
not by chance
Now let me get this straight, so to speak. MSNBC has no problem airing hate speech against Palestinians, but NBC refuses a message from a church saying it welcomes everyone . They pay Don Imus to insult Arabs in mourning, and they won’t even take money from the United Church of Christ to broadcast a message that Christ wouldn’t have turned away gay people. NBC, owned by GE: weapons manufacturer, major contributor to W’s “campaign.”