Juan Cole points out that two weeks of Bush’s post-war war in
Thursday, December 30, 2004
tsunami math
Tuesday, December 28, 2004
Sunday, December 26, 2004
whiny campus republicans
So, the foolishness about liberals on campus continues. In response to the recent articles about how there are more democrats than republicans on faculties, a colleague started a series of emails about the whole thing. I won’ t post those here, though I will note some of the rebuttal links, from Ellen Goodman and the LATimes. (See also my earlier post on Juan Cole.)
And I’ll respond to a piece forwarded from the Chronicle of Higher Ed.
The pseudonymous Chronicle author reports on his oppressively liberal education:
During an "Introduction to Political Science" class, for example, I was required to write paper [sic] on how to solve global warming. My paper suggested that perhaps there was no reason to, since the scientific evidence was inconclusive. I got a D.
Now, it’s true that the overwhelming scientific consensus on this might not have been as evident when this fellow was an undergraduate-- I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt on that. But after all there’s something to be said for actually responding to an assignment. And even that leftist cabal, the Pentagon, considers the thought experiment worth engaging.
He also complains
In another class, I fell victim to my own indignation at having to use inclusive language in my papers. Flexing the muscle of my perceived linguistic superiority -- the masculine third-person singular pronoun across many languages functions as the generic, genderless third person, after all -- I argued that "he" should be in and "s/he" should be out. Another D paper.
Well, historically, “he” was not a gender-neutral pronoun in English. It was in the 18th century that academies tried to regularize the language, and decided it should count for that. But in fact, of course, people do tend to imagine the person referred to as “he” is male. And, again, there’s the responding-to-the-assignment issue.
Finally he bemoans the parking lot at his new job:
the rustless Volvos and Subarus exuded a clear semiotics of inclusion and exclusion. … “here we drive academic cars”
Ok, this one is just whiny. A Subaru only costs about two thousand dollars more than the Honda Accord the writer reports driving himself, and since he was recently out of grad school, well of course he drove a cheaper car than the faculty members who’d probably paid off those grad school debts and gotten used to having a decent paycheck. I mean, assuming the cars’ prices are the issue here. They're "rustless," by the way, because his new job is in the South. And if it’s just an aesthetic thing, well, I drive a Honda myself (okay, it’s a hybrid Insight, but still). Whiny.
Saturday, December 25, 2004
fascists r us
Gonzales, loss of habeas corpus, torture, right wing judges-to-be, the lapdog lying press--Elaine Cassel in Counterpunch lists some of the disasters of our fascist state.
happy holidays
Thursday, December 16, 2004
military family values
The article observes that the plan to send more troops to
Friday, December 10, 2004
our tax dollars at work
Rep Henry Waxman's report on The Content of Federally Funded Abstinence- Only Education Programs finds that these curricula, meant for children and adolescents, present "false, misleading, or distorted information about reproductive health" (including assertions that an abortion will make you sterile and that condoms don't protect against STDs) and stunningly outdated stereotypes about gender roles. For example, one curriculum lists 'Financial Support' as one of 'The 5 Major Needs of Women' and 'Domestic Support' as one of 'The 5 Major Needs of Men.' The curriculum states: "Just as a woman needs to feel a man's devotion to her, a man has a primary need to feel a woman's admiration. To admire a man is to regard him with wonder, delight and approval. A man feels admired when his unique characteristics and talents happily amaze her."
(via Girl In The Locker Room)
I don't need anyone supporting me financially, but anyone who's seen my apartment can tell you I could really use some domestic support. Apparently, I'm a man.
That's why I pay my taxes to kill Iraqi civilians.
Thursday, December 09, 2004
vote, schmote, smote
Well my comrades tell me the vote counting issue was dismissed at the Solidarity meeting not as insufficiently socialist or revolutionary or progressive, but as already taken care of, as not neglected, not the next place to push an analysis or action.
Fair enough.
But isn’t it inconsistent of me to suggest I’m some poststructuralist postmodernist ex-post-positivist, and then the next week or so be saying something is just wrong?
Well, duh.
And in other military coverups: Whitewashing torture? A veteran sergeant who told his commanding officers that he witnessed his colleagues torturing Iraqi detainees was strapped to a gurney and flown out of
Monday, December 06, 2004
vote, vote, who's got the vote?
At Sunday's Solidarity meeting (the socialist brunch group), the view seemed to be that the socialist reason to care about this sort of thing is to connect with minority voters. Call me naive, but I can't help feeling it's just wrong to be disenfranchising people and rigging elections.
And then there's the affidavit from the fellow in Florida who says he was hired by Rep. Tom Feeny (R-FL) to write vote rigging software.
Wednesday, December 01, 2004
not by chance
Now let me get this straight, so to speak. MSNBC has no problem airing hate speech against Palestinians, but NBC refuses a message from a church saying it welcomes everyone . They pay Don Imus to insult Arabs in mourning, and they won’t even take money from the United Church of Christ to broadcast a message that Christ wouldn’t have turned away gay people. NBC, owned by GE: weapons manufacturer, major contributor to W’s “campaign.”
Monday, November 29, 2004
adjunct radicals
Juan Cole has addressed better than I’d ever be likely to bother to do the recently recurrent bugaboo about liberals in academe. In short—it’s not clear exactly what counts as a ‘liberal’; it’s probably not true (if one includes conservative programs like engineering and economics) that there are a disproportionate number of them in academia; to the extent that is it true it can’t be a conspiracy but is probably because the pay is so low and right-wingers can make more money in the private sector of business or think tanks. Not to mention that those think tanks and corporate boards are disproportionately republican/right, and no one is talking about rebalancing those by adding some leftists. Also, I would add, maybe liberals have more of a service ethic and are more willing to work for lower pay, and what about the possibility that more education makes people more liberal? How is it that education and intelligence seem to be disqualifying factors in American public life?
Wednesday, November 24, 2004
the shape of enlightenment
The shape of November is numerically flexible: second Tuesday, last Thursday, dark and cold and those bright yellow leaves against bare black branches. Not like July 4, 14 July, those dates, bright and sunny any day of the week.
Look hard enough and you can see this mindset in the current Bush campaign. The Bush-Cheney billboards with the single slogan: One Nation Under God. The unwavering certainty of the supporters in Marlton. Bush's inability to name a single mistake of his presidency. There can be no doubt; they are doing the Lord's work.
One of my students (the lone Bush voter in a class of 16, as it happens) wanted to argue in an essay that all notions of justice come from religion. So much for the Enlightenment. (I pointed out to her there were secular theorists of justice, and anyway, she should concentrate her argument on something about the class texts and do-able in 5 pages).
Anyway, various bloggers are now declaring themselves proud members of the reality-based community. Me, too, but maybe in a poststructuralist kind of way. Talk about strange bedfellows. I mean, I saw a PBS documentary about Rumsfeld’s “war with the Pentagon” a few weeks ago and it made me all sympathetic to the military. Jeez.
Sunday, November 21, 2004
blgprblems
Perhaps I need a new cmputer. That wuld be computer. That would be would. The O key sticks. The space bar sticks. And I am a crummy typist anyway, even on the best of keybards. Uh, keyboards. Though a keybard would come in handy. Singing, bardically, everytime I sat down to type. Anyway writing turns out to be a little more work than it might otherwise be, if I had either a keybard or a keyboard that worked. A little more work than the usual ease that Dorothy Parker so well described (“writing is easy, you just sit down and open up a vein”). Oh, yeah, otherwise I’d be churning out those essays and letters and lectures and stories. Yeah. And this blg, blog, whatever, which I must have started because I had so very much spare time on my hands? Nah, I just had some spare outrage on my hands.
Anyway, the outrage is fading into numbness as the catastrophe piles up.
This from Walter Benjamin:
A Klee painting named ‘Angelus Novus’ shows an angel looking as though he is about to move away from something he is fixedly contemplating. His eyes are staring, his mouth is open, his wings are spread. This is how one pictures the angel of history. His face is turned toward the past. Where we perceive a chain of events, he sees one single catastrophe which keeps piling wreckage and hurls it in front of his feet. The angel would like to stay, awaken the dead, and make whole what has been smashed. But a storm is blowing in from
Friday, November 19, 2004
selection update
Q: What do you think of US democracy?
A: I think it would be a good idea.
Wednesday, November 17, 2004
hell in a handbasket, film at 11
The world is going to hell in a handbasket, and yet most of the time I am thinking about the books I am teaching and the committee I'm on and the courses I'm planning and the people I talk with and quotidian life as though people weren't being shot in the head, bombed, buried under rubble or pierced with shrapnel or . . . you get the idea. Not to mention the constitution being gutted. Not to mention tens of thousands of children dying of curable diseases, of people starving to death.
Friday, November 12, 2004
red dreams
Mostly at this point I want to stay in the hut and dream red dreams. Bloody dreams. Commie dreams. Stateless dreams.
Sunday, November 07, 2004
has god spoken, or was she just clearing her throat?
Friday, November 05, 2004
man and wife
Texas schools will be getting new textbooks. To conform with state law banning gay marriage, they'll replace texts that use phrases like "married partners" instead of "husband and wife." So it's not just anxiety about gay people having great sex (was it Mencken who defined a Puritan as someone haunted by the fear that someone, somewhere, is enjoying something) but about making sure gender roles are clear. "Husband" and "wife": those terms conjure up a world where women defer to men and do all the housework.
Thursday, November 04, 2004
we was robbed
This week's US election didn't meet international standards for clean elections
paperless electronic voting
No paper trail, no recount. Diebold delivers the votes. The ghost votes in the machines. Exit polls (which were accurate in paper ballot states) showed Kerry winning Florida and Ohio.
absentee ballots
Plenty of people never got theirs--college students, military folk in Iraq, sundry expatriates.
In a course I teach, out of 16 students, one didn't get her absentee ballot fromAlaska. Another has a friend stationed in Iraq, who didn't get his ballot; neither did any of those he's stationed with.
registration problems
Sproul was hired by the republican party to register voters, and apparently encouraged workers to ditch, destroy non-Republican registration forms.
polling access
People turned away for lack of identification. It happened in New Orleans, I hear. Voter intimidation & supression was not infrequent, and worst for students and, of course, in communities of color.
disenfranchisement
felons, former felons, possible felons, people with names that resemble those of felons, people who might vote democratic--purged, purged, purged.